Did the media misconsture the polar bear numbers report?

I blogged about such a media report here. Its not an unreasonable question - is the media playing up a part of the report out of context? Or is *this* report trying to make a silk purse out of a sows ear? Opinions anyone?

But these headlines misconstrue an important fact about the study: It found that while polar bear populations suffered between 2004 and 2006, their numbers largely recovered between 2007 and 2010. Furthermore, the recovery came even as Arctic sea ice coverage continued to shrink